kdmurray.blog

The crossroads of life and tech

Project “Gutsy Gibbon” — Adventures with Ubuntu

I’ve been running a Linux machine at the house for some time now, experimenting with trying to use it for a central file server where I can get at things like music and pictures from any of the computers in the house, and in some cases from over the Internet.

I’ve tried using various incarnations of Red Hat including the Fedora Core (5 & 6) series, but eventually I hit some kind of a wall and give up. After all the technology is supposed to be there to serve me, not the other way around.

'A Grid'
Photo Credit: IO_Burn on Flickr

Last week I listened to the second episode of the Knightcast. This was the continuation of the series “the Grid”. The main focus of the episode was getting started using Ubuntu as a “power-station” in a home or (very small) business network.

I listen to most of my podcasts in the car, so the first time I listened to this episode, I was driving around the city on my daily commute and it gave me lots of time to think about just how useful this type of “home server” might be. When I got home, I pulled the podcast up and went through the first part of it again, the bit that explains some of how the server could be put to good use. Most of it is pretty common sense stuff. The “power-station” server machine allows for a central place in your home where documents, media and other files can be stored and it provides a mechanism for making that data remotely accessible.

Knightwise also discussed a couple of options for remote administration, which is always a good thing. I’d much rather be able to addess and deal with my server by way of my MacBook from the deck (or the bedroom) instead of tromping all the way downstairs where the (very noisy) desktop machines have been relegated.

Almost immediately a few new possibilities began rolling to mind…

For some of the software development that I do, it would be very handy to have access to a SubVersion repository that I could use to manage the code from anywhere on the Internet. Oh sure, there are other services like SourceForge and GoogleCode which offer similar services, but it never hurts to be able to have full control over your machine, and your information.

With a built-in server, adding FTP (or better yet SFTP) capability makes it that much easier to share specific files or data with friends and colleagues. Again you could sign up for a service like X-Drive or Box.net for this, but why not take advantage of owning all your own data. If done correctly, the self-hosted model can be much more secure.

Add to this the fact that my router, by way of it’s spanky new DD-WRT firmware, supports several free DDNS services, and I have a new server set up to serve my content on the web or anywhere else. And I don’t even have to remember my IP address (which admittedly hasn’t changed in the over 2 years I’ve had my service… thank you Mr. ISP!)

It sounds like there are going to be some more great tips coming up in future Knightcast episodes featuring “the Grid”. I wonder what else my 6-year old P4 desktop will be able to do for me!

Microsoft Agrees to EU’s Anti-Monopoly Legislation… *sigh*

Since 1998, Microsoft has been in a battle with EU regulators over allegations that they have engaged in monopolistic business practices.  These allegations are similar to the anti-trust suit brought against the Redmond giant in the US Microsoft has now agreed to give up its battle against the antitrust legislation in an effort to stop the fines accruing against them at €3 million per day.

At the heart of the 1998 complaint: the bundling of Media Player with Windows, and the high licensing cost of information required for applications to work more efficiently with the Windows Operating System.

Under the deal brokered with the EU, Microsoft has agreed to license it’s intellectual property, with the exception of patents, for a one-time €10,000 fee.  This is in place of the nearly 3% in royalty payments Microsoft had previously demanded.  Patented material will be licensed for just under half a percent of the royalties.  This fee was previously priced at 5.95%.

As much as I want to applaud an action like this, the sentiments at the core of the action taken by the EU smack of government interference.  From what I can tell, aside from a very pricey operating system, Microsoft has done nothing to harm the consumer.  They have a company that has invested money to either buy or develop software technologies, and are now being forced to license that technology to competitors for a specific price.

In some ways, this is similar to regulations put in place by the CRTC in Canada which have fixed the price of telephone service that can be offered to customers by the large carriers.  The prices have been fixed in such a way that the carriers are not permitted to lower the price for fears that they will resort to pricing tactics that will eliminate any competitors.  This was done without any evidence that any of the major carriers like Bell or Telus were resorting to such tactics.

Will this type of legislation help software developers create new and improved technologies and programs?  Yes.  For Windows.   Will it help them to develop programs for other systems?  Not likely.  Will it help Microsoft sell more copies of Windows to people who want to use the new software?  Probably.  So tell me, EU: How does selling more copies of the most expensive server operating system in the world help consumers?

Next month, the review of the Google acquisition of DoubleClick is slated to complete.  We’ll see what they have in store for another technology giant.

Sources